152493 tabs

          16354 artists

          58051 members


Forgot password



Browse artists:

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z 0-9 
TAB   "Fears Release"  -  13  COMMENTS  -  PAGE 1
Fears Release      [GP4]   [72 hits]   [Version: 1]   [Id: 105619]
Artist: Open Competition Feb 2009
File Size: 46.6 KB     Number of Tracks: 5
Submitted by: daniel9388  (All tabs)  on 12 Feb 2009 13:01, commenting:
Its a metal tune. I hope you all like it.
Validated by blackiel on 12 Feb 2009 14:02


More Fears Release tabs @ 911tabs.com

|<< << 1 >> >>|
the theme is actually funny
and it seems well writen
yeah, a lot of ideas, finely sticked, and well produced

not STUNING, but good

perhaps the only notable complain could be the outro, too too too random.
But the song is good

well congrats, you can be sure all this I've said I don't say it too often.

Rating: 3.5

Posted by stockle  {{ 15 tabs / 0 corrections }}  on: 12 Feb 2009 18:26

Rated as: 
I can't say I'm a huge fan of this sort of music - it's simply too odd for my liking. Random ideas, yet they don't sound INCREDIBLY awful - you somehow manage to keep... some form of a song here, which I find rather amazing. It's strange - I look at the tab, and I feel that this is going to sound terrible, but... it doesn't quite. Anyway, that's about all I can say - I'll be interested to see what else you can come up with, regardless of my personal taste.

3 stars.

Posted by Quibokk  {{ 16 tabs / 0 corrections }}  on: 13 Feb 2009 05:40

Rated as: Unrated
I dont like the main riff, but everything works i guess. The lead guitar doesn't

fit in which is bad, you should have done minor arpeggios or something. The

Breakdown is pretty cool, especially the lead guitar. The Break changes the

entire tempo of the song, there's not a smooth transition which is not good.

You needed a riff to get down to that tempo. Really the main highlight of the

song is the breakdown, other than that it isn't composed well and isn't very


2.5 stars

Posted by Spin  {{ 5 tabs / 1 corrections }}  on: 21 Feb 2009 22:10

Rated as: 
This song is quite hard for me to comment on. I didn’t get the sense of shock from the opening, but it might be because I’ve heard music like this before. The keys that came in at the start really added a dramatic effect to the song, and I liked it. The 1st verse I didn’t quite like, guess that randomness is setting in right about there.

The breakdown was very odd, but it seemed so natural to me for some strange reason, as if I had actually heard it before. The bridge seemed a little too slow, but I guess it’s expected for this type of song.

The build up was funny, did it actually go anywhere? I was getting ready for some creepy solo from the guitar or the keys. The outro is probably the hardest part for me to write about. I would say it’s creepy, but it has some other description in there I cannot put my finger on, so I’ll just tell you what came to mind. I imagine seeing a clown sitting at a grand piano playing that tune in a black tuxedo.


Posted by apzrman  {{ 7 tabs / 3 corrections }}  on: 22 Feb 2009 05:11

Rated as: Unrated
The song title captures very well the feeling of this song. There were some good sections. Especially the bridge. I don't know why you had a mix event on the keys track for the bridge to change it to strings; why not just add a strings track? The dissonance again worked well. The riffs and drums rhythm did the job. However, the outro didn't seem to fit the song and I didn't find that special something that stood out. But I liked it.

Posted by blackiel  {{ 0 tabs / 0 corrections }}  on: 22 Feb 2009 15:00

Rated as: 
The beginning was actually very good and made me think that the rest of the song was as good or even better. But, I was disappointed when the rest of the song was quite mean. I suggest including more musical elements.
I missed a solo (again).


Posted by MNC_Metal  {{ 4 tabs / 0 corrections }}  on: 24 Feb 2009 02:46

Rated as: Unrated
I guess I'm not the guy you should be paying most attention to when it comes to this kind of metal, it's just too far away from my musical preferences. I guess for it's kind of music it's fairly good, although I felt that a couple of the elements were way too random. The drums are decent if basic, the bass could have been developed more IMO, and the guitars seem kinda basic too though (the lead guitar really wasn't my cup of tea, so I'll just leave it at that). I'd say that as a composer you've yet got some way to go, but some of the riffs are able to capture the listener, which is a step in the right direction. I'd say work on developing your drums and bass elements, and the song will feel abit more alive. Anyways, not bad, even if it seems very basic instrument-wise


Posted by Shade Of Blue  {{ 15 tabs / 0 corrections }}  on: 27 Feb 2009 11:48

Rated as: 
I didnt like this song. At all. Sorry. It’s just that there’s nothing that catchs my attention. I know I use this word a lot, but this song is too random. The only thing that I can say it’s good in this song is the drums, and the feeling that the keys give. But the guitar tracks sound bad to me, maybe the reason for that is the crappy MIDI, just maybe...

Rating 1.5

Posted by Todo Winterwolf  {{ 11 tabs / 0 corrections }}  on: 27 Feb 2009 17:47

Rated as: Unrated
I really apreciate cromatism, cromatic riffs, cromatic chords, everything, and I think that's way I like Jazz music, but you really over used it without harmonicaly sense. Intro is good, it's like a construction, adding something new after a few bars which is good. Then the verse has that something i told about cromatism. Let me tell you something, you have improved a lot since the first stuff I heard your stuff, but I have the feeling that your song are pretty much the same and too similar to each other.
Then there's no structure at all, just this parts "glued" to each other. I can't go on further with my coment, there is no harmony through the whole song, orchestration doesn't exist here.

Rate: 2.0

Posted by Daslaf  {{ 22 tabs / 0 corrections }}  on: 28 Feb 2009 15:45

Rated as: 
Daniel9388 – Fears Release
As I have come to expect from you, the rhythmic department is a lot stronger than the harmony in this song. You have some nice rhythmic ideas throughout, and interesting bar choices like having a 3 bar sequence repeat in the intro which here was a great idea.

Breakdown begins to bore me, the rhythm is way too simple and goes on so long, it’s kind of a bore. The lead helps a little but not much. Verse 1 starts out ok, but the second half of it with the extra guitar sounds real bad. Bridge again, the same thing – it’s kind of monotonous and the second guitar and keys add undesirable dissonance. The bad kind of dissonance. The second half removes the guitar dissonance, but the keys is still putting me off. Build again, simple and kind of boring. Nothing there to grab my interest - no interesting rhythms or harmonies. The outro has a charm to it, reminds me of a Satyricon tune. Unfortunately the piano 16ths in every other bar sound not so good with the rest, and then not to mention the bad solo. I didn’t really like it - had no interesting phrases or anything going on. But a good attempt in any case, you used notes within the harmonic context at least.

As I said with the last song as well, I see potential in you, but you still have to work on it. Your harmonies and dissonance really do not sound good – so that’s a thing to work on. Also maybe have some parts of the song repeat so you get an impression of this being not just a riff salad. Your rhythms are ok right now; the main problem for me is the harmonies you have. You use dissonance without control it seems, just generally very little control of the harmony. You could try and make stuff less repetitive and monotonous too.

Still some parts are good, mainly when only one of the two guitars are playing.

Rating: 2

Posted by Beckkill  {{ 11 tabs / 0 corrections }}  on: 02 Mar 2009 09:01

Rated as: 
daniel9388 – Fears Release

*smiles* I'm liking the stuff you're composing nowadays :] the intro was dam kewl, I liked the interplay between the components – they created a cool wall of dissonance. Then we get followed by the chuggy verse 1, and I'm happily nodding my head along, thoroughly enjoying the music. The breakdown is a pleasant surprise, you get this unexpected feel followed by yer best lead to date. It wasn't over the top at all, felt very focused. Neat.

Next up is verse two... can I please have verse one back? It was better really... bridge doesn't do a whole lot to save the day, feels a bit boring in its foreseeable chugginess... nonetheless, bar 105 for the win :P sometime around the mentioned bar 105 I notice how the song is rather disjointed and all over the place, yet by some weird miracle seems to flow. And I like it... the buildup doesn't really feel like a buildup again, maybe it's guitar pro not passing on the energy of this being played on real instruments, so I'm not letting it get in the way of my opinion. The outro is a blast again, with the hilarious keys, feels eerily tongue-in-cheek, and then the demented clean – ace.

Overall impressions – a number of unbelievable parts, some weaker stuff in the middle, but a blast to listen to nevertheless. Can I ask you to try and focus really, really hard the next time you write a comp song, and just feel it with win like the win parts, and try to evade the slightly more boring stuff? I know you can to it, man! ;]

Rating: 3 stars

Posted by RumpyTheRubbuhChikin  {{ 30 tabs / 0 corrections }}  on: 04 Mar 2009 16:57

Rated as: 
daniel9388 - fears release
Weird, crazy, total mayhem - and I mean this to be good things this time. The song lacks some
things, but originality isn't one of those! This is a hard song to comment though.

- originality: Absolutly!
- composition technique: well, there's something that make me feel like it could be better, but I can't
say exactly what, great judge I am... :P
- rhythm: Well, the bass and drums could be better, more original, like the rest of the song.
- appropriate key signature: I guess.
- song structure: the intro is too long, and by intro, I mean everything up to Verse 1.
- quality of notation/tablature: Both tabulature and notation on non-fretted tracks, otherwise good.
- orchestration: Crazy, 'nuff said.
- use and respect of musical language: Sounds more like slang, but in a new, cool way.;-)
- use and quality of
Melody = To say there would be melodies that stand out is to lie, but it isn't based too much on this.
Hooks = Well, it's too weird (good way) to have any.
Solos = Good.
Riffs = Really interesting.
- mix of instruments and panning: Very good
- general use of the GP software: Above average.

Rating: 2,5

Posted by Generis Humani  {{ 53 tabs / 0 corrections }}  on: 06 Mar 2009 06:01

Rated as: 
Well, commenting on this is gonna be tough. I personally did not enjoy any part of this song. It's kinda as if you wanted it to feel dark, but you went a bit too far with it, and left it with a sense of no feeling at all. It's quite original, but it's just everywhere for me. You clearly have skill with GP, the mixture of volumes and use of panning was quite good, but that's really all i can say.
Rating: 2

Posted by UpZeIrons  {{ 0 tabs / 0 corrections }}  on: 08 Mar 2009 18:12

Rated as: Unrated
|<< << 1 >> >>|
Please login to post comment.
Contact Site Administration: gprotab_admin@gprotab.net